Uncategorized

Regarding art.

A prominent theme in Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray, I’ve noticed, is art – the nature of art, the purpose of art, etc. In the preface, Wilde argues that beautiful things are just that – beautiful things, and that people who try to find meaning in them “do so at their peril.” Lord Henry and Basil Hallward both echo this sentiment, essentially arguing that art is art, nothing more, and that “An artist should create beautiful things, but should put nothing of his own life into them.”

So, what do all of you think? Is art meant to “reveal art and conceal the artist”? Is it even possible, or is there always a little bit of the artist in his/her work?

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Regarding art.”

  1. There is always something of the man/woman in the work of art of an artist.Look just at "The Picture of Dorian Gray". How much of Oscar Wilde the man, is it in there? Much, indeed. Wilde also said "Art is useless", art is only for art's sake. This is something I can't share: I think that every form of art has its own purpose, no effort to express or communicate can be aimless.

  2. Agreed with Maria. You can't write, draw, paint, knit, carve or express yourself in any creative way without leaving something of yourself behind. That's the entire point of art. It's who you are.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s